• Cart$0
  • Log In
  • Cart
  • Checkout

  • Home.
  • About.
  • Resource Library.
  • Consult Shop.
  • Copy Shop.
  • Thrift Shop.
  • Blog.
  • Virgin?
  • Featured.
  • Events.
  • Contact.
ashley ambirge TMF Project

Blog

  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Join our Facebook Group
  • RSS

Red High Heels, Slaughtered Pigs & Why Being Unsure Is A Good Thing

this entry has 33 Comments/ in Lessons + Stories from the Road / by Ash

I am in hot, humid, sweaty-in-all-the-wrong-places Central America, and I am invited to a Christmas party.

Eager to experience the holiday through a shiny new cultural lens, my mistletoe and I happily accept.   In the name of cross-cultural exchange, I carry an innocent little twig of mistletoe, in hopes it will aid my mission to gather a more intimate knowledge of the culture, if you know what I mean.  Wink-wink-elbow jab.

The taxi drops me off at the address.   It’s dark.   It’s muddy.  I’m wearing red heels.  I can envision it now:

 

Perfect little tan bodied, long-haired, hoop earring donning Latina female number one: Who brought the idiot who can’t even walk like a proper woman in tacones?

Perfect little tan bodied, long-haired, hoop earring donning Latina female number two: Pshhh, who cares.  She’s a gringa–what do you expect?

As I not-so-gracefully tip-toe my way around the emerging pieces of rock that play a cruel game of peek-a-boo with me and the dry, hard earth, threatening to make a fool out of me with just one wrong step, I reprimand myself for not just surrendering to flats and settling for stumpy.  But what latin lover is going to want to whisk the stumpy, sweaty girl off her feet?  None.  Especially a stumpy, sweaty girl that, for reasons unknown, is dangling a strange, berry-laden plant above her head.

My schizophrenic thought-process is immediately put on hold in response to a disturbingly sudden, high-pitched shrill that echoes throughout the air.

As I approach the house, I hear it again, but this time much louder. And again. And once again.

As I make my grand entrance into the door of the tin-roofed home–a bit nervous, knowing I will be a stranger in the room–I am greeted not with the warm welcome I was optimistically envisioning, but rather, by an unexpected, alarming scene of sorts that instantaneously sends a wave of nausea rushing through me.

The image is just as horrifying as the sound:  A massive pig, larger than most of the humans that surround it, is being violently chased in circles around the backyard.  There are five males, each armed with what appears to be an oversized mallet, scrambling around the yard, determined to deliver a mighty blow to the panic-stricken pig atop its head to render it unconscious, at which point its throat will be pierced with the large machete that dutifully hangs from the wall.

I quickly ascertain that heels were most definitely an inappropriate selection of footwear for this party.

 

Well, That’s Awkward

I am horrified. I have no idea what to say, do or even feel, and can’t bear to watch as they silence the pig’s last desperate squeal, and collectively heave it onto a large wooden chopping block to saw off its head.

As the rest of the attendees take delight in gathering around the cauldron-like wok they have suspended over a fire with the help of three heavy-duty chains, patiently awaiting sliced pieces of pig fat to be fried and served, I, on the other hand, sit on an opposite side of the yard, quietly sipping my lager and contemplating, philosophizing, mourning.

Witnessing this event was a great mental exercise for me, and one that boldly challenged my perception of reality, ostentatiously mocking it with its unabashed display of complete and utter opposition to my ingrained cultural norms, which was, by extension, opposition to everything I had previously known to be true.

I fling the mistletoe to the ground.  There will be no stolen kisses tonight.

Words such as PETA, animal cruelty, and inhumane come to mind, as I question the ethics–or, perhaps, lack of ethics–of the human race.  But then, I’m suddenly also forced to question myself.  My automatic reaction is to be appalled, and to proclaim such an act as loathsome, detestable and just plain cold-blooded.

But then, I think, is it actually?

I remind myself that we, too, kill thousands and thousands of pigs each year for consumption, and, according to some recent documentaries, we aren’t as “humane” in our practices as we might like to think.

That said, I question why it doesn’t bother me if I don’t have to witness it with my own eyes.

 

Worth Contemplating, But Not My Point

I don’t intend for this to be a statement of my position on the integrity of eating meat, because, frankly, I don’t have one.  I am from Scranton, Pennsylvania.  There’s no question that I like meat.  Right now, it’s not about that; it’s about the far broader message that can be extrapolated here.

No matter how you dice it, the simple fact is that it’s unfair for me to judge, because I’m judging based on a different set of rules.   A set of rules that we’ve internalized and perpetuated among ourselves as truth, when, in reality, it’s not truth–it’s purely our perception of truth. Relative to this example, it’s our perception of how we view right and wrong. And this, to me, was wrong.  But I’ll tell you what–to the people at the party, there was nothing wrong about it.   Their truth is that the merits of to-kill-a-pig-or-not-to-kill-a-pig just isn’t a debate that exists.  On the other hand, what does exist is the need to eat, and, frankly, it’s a luxury to have meat at all.  No one is disturbed.  No one is shuddering.   Instead, they are rejoicing.  They are grateful to be fortunate enough to even have the opportunity to kill a pig.

There are some obvious implications that should come as no surprise, namely that, as I’ve stated before, reality is subjective.  But it goes beyond that, and makes another, perhaps less salient point:

Subjectivity implies choice.

You have two choices:  Allow society at large to define your perspectives on your behalf, or define your perspectives for yourself.

What do you really think?  What do you really believe?  … Do you even know?

There is no inherent benefit in accepting the perspectives that society arbitrarily determines for us–whether it’s right versus wrong or any other myriad of possibilities.  There is a perceived benefit, though, and it goes by the name of fitting in.  But, in my view, that’s far from beneficial; quite the opposite, actually.  On the other hand, when you’re capable enough to cut through the noise and learn how to think independently of the group, that’s where the real benefits lie.

Am I saying that I’ve shed my deeply ingrained culturally-based thought patterns overnight, and am a newly converted, red heel wearing pig butcher, in the name of independent thought?  No, certainly not.

But am I open to the possibility that this isn’t as loathsome, detestable and cold-blooded as I was originally inclined to think?

Yes.

If there are currently 7 billion people (that’s 7,000,000,000, in case you need all of those fancy zeros to conceptualize just how many people that truly is) on this planet, and all of us have different perceptions of what’s right or what’s wrong, or whether or not red heels do anything at all to detract from stumpy sweatiness, then it would be preposterously arrogant of me to assert my own perception of right or wrong as truth.  Extended beyond pig killings, if we can learn to apply a similar thought process to other traditionally rigid ideas, such as religion, marriage or even what constitutes success, who knows?  We might just do alright for ourselves, after all.  Not to mention a possible diminishing of supremacism, americentrism, racism, and a host of other ugly -isms and the unflattering baggage that comes with it.

It all starts with the pig, I say.

And with that, I take all of my assumptions, and throw them haphazardly to the wind.

I am left with only two questions:

1)  Where can I find some more mistletoe?
2)  Who’s your daddy now, life?


Tweet
Tags: Costa Rica, culture, lifestyle design, perception, pigs, reality, right and wrong, society, Travelicious

Subscribe

It's free. Unlike the wine you drank last night.

← Tired of Having A Neverending To-Do List? Use It To Your Advantage (previous entry)
(next entry) The Flawed Cycle of Success That Could Be Causing You To Fail →
Related Posts
Hula Hoop Contest 2010!
The One Thing That Can (And Will) Mess Up Your Lif...
Perhaps The Preamble Should Read: We, The Robots....
The Surefire Way to Save Yourself from Mediocrity ...
  • http://www.louboutin-onlineshop.com red high heels

    Just a test

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JGTQO44NI3PPWYL2B4FPK6JZVU Julian

    its a damn pig wats the big deal

  • http://bloglines.com/blog/suedepumps Suede Pumps

    Thanks for information, I’ll always keep updated here!

  • Pingback: Leaping, Diving & Plunging Head First Into Humanity | the middle finger project

  • http://www.BeAwesomeOnline.com Catherine Caine

    I have recently-ish decided that all actions performed by human beings fall into three categories:

    - Stuff I like
    - Stuff I don't want to do myself, but have fun
    - Stuff no-one should do, ever

    Once I realised that, and sketched out the third category (which has all the stuff you think would be on there: murder, rape, intolerance, yadda yadda), I found it much easier to be relaxed about things in the second category (which would include red high heels and pig-chasing).

    Also, I can better differentiate between “having a religion” (category 2) and the horrifying Category Three things a lot of people do BECAUSE of their religion. I can be cool with my co-worker – a genuinely caring and cool Christian – while still being very uncool with religious nutjobs.

    Also, fair warning: this is my first comment, but expect to see me around a lot. I like it here. :)

    • TMFproject

      I'm digging these categories, Catherine! (P.S. Is Catherine how you like to be called?)

      I'm mostly intrigued by your last point–the difference between having a religion, and doing things in the name of religion. Interesting distinction here, that should probably be addressed in a future blog post. :P I have many friends who are very religious, but this doesn't mean I necessarily agree with the ways their religion manifests itself in their lives. Nor does it mean that I have to agree, nor should they with my perspectives. Truth is such a tricky concept, and I don't believe that universal truth exists–therefore, it's impossible to impose my beliefs on others, and I only hope that they maintain the same respect toward me.

      Know what I mean? :)

      Why do I suddenly feel like there should be some incredibly cool hip-hop beat that we are both kind of bobbing our heads to in agreement? Do we need to have a theme song?

      • http://www.BeAwesomeOnline.com Catherine Caine

        Catherine, Kitty, Cat… these are all good.

        Yeah, I really dig on the distinction between “Believing in Invisible Sky Dude”, which is, well, not my thing but not in itself problematic, and “Disowning Your Gay Son”, which is right into Category Three.
        I used to just disapprove of religion in general, but there are religions/philosophies (like Buddhism) that don't seem to produce Category Three behaviour, and believers in religions like Christianity who don't do anything Cat 3. So now I just disapprove of religion as a regular producer of Cat 3 behaviour, while being okay with it in principle.

        We do need a theme song. We do. I will accept all suggestions!

  • TMFproject

    Haha, oh no – did I just start an unintentional campaign against morality of my own? Nietzsche & I would likely be good friends – I've been intending to read his argument against the morality of Christianity. Perhaps now would be an appropriate time, while I'm on my philosophical streak. :p Thanks so much for contributing to the convo – some good food for thought here!

  • TMFproject

    Cheers to that! You point to a heavy influence on one's thought patterns that I wasn't even considering–parents. In contemplating that, it's almost scary to realize the control that's afforded to some parents, because not everyone would be open-minded enough to encourage their children to think critically, as your parents have done for you. Imagine. This must be where serial killers come from. :p

  • http://rulesoptional.com Andrew MacPherson

    …and thus begins our descent into moral relativism…

    Next stop: cannibalism, or worse… men in thongs.

    • TMFproject

      I suppose I do take a normative position on things, hinting at the fact that there might not be one universal moral standard by which to judge others. As far as cannibalism goes, I suppose that if you were starving to death from famine, you might reconsider your position on the topic as well. Objectively speaking, there isn't much difference in eating the meat of a cow, chicken, deer, etc., but I guess we feel differently because of the shared human experience. Hell, our country was founded by cannibalism – back in Jamestown, some guy admitted to killing, salting and eating his pregnant wife so he could carry on with his mission. American pride, right there, baby! Admittedly, that's gross, and I'm certainly not advocating for it, but since you brought it up…cannibalism is only gross because we've collectively agreed as a society that it is so. Or no? Is it inherently wrong? That said, men in thongs MIGHT be an exception. ;)

  • Brian W.

    “There are two things I can’t stand in this world: people who are intolerant of other people’s culture, and the Dutch.” – Austin Powers

    I'm with you on the cultural lenses and the subjectivity and all that, but I don't think *everything* is subjective. I'm not going to accept a culture as “ok, just different” that is all about infanticide, rape, poisoning water supplies, and rickrolling. Having determined that it's not all subjective, I'm going to say that there are cases where it IS ok to dismiss someone else's culture. That's not to say I'm going to go to war with them. I'm just reserving the right to call them wrong.

    In this case, I really can't argue with someone that couldn't accept the events of your pig party. I personally wouldn't make a stink of it, I suppose. I also wouldn't judge someone for saying they don't want to make nice with a culture that celebrates and draws out killing an animal that can feel both pain and fear. Especially if it's consistent with their previous ethical decisions (like being vegetarian or some such).

    That's kind of an interesting quandary – who has the higher philosophical ground here? The one who makes a moral judgement that it's not ok to dismiss another culture, or the one that says we shouldn't always dismiss people that dismiss another culture? Down the rabbit hole I go.

    • TMFproject

      This was a fantastic comment – thank you. And while I certainly follow the argument presented, and, in some cases, can agree with it, I think the entire thing is still based upon the underlying cultural assumption that killing is bad, which asserts the converse, sister cultural assumption that life is valuable. And if the entire argument for objectivity (i.e. “I don't think everything is subjective”) is dependent upon the acceptance of a subjective assumption, then what ground are we standing on? Isn't it flawed from conception?

      P.S. I'm not a murderer.

      • TMFproject

        I'd also like to hear Andrew MacPherson's response to this.

      • Brian W.

        Yes, I suppose I cannot place complete confidence in the objective (at least in some constrained cases) nature of the universe. I understand that I can't know the answers for sure, but lacking some other than my mind to work with, I'm going to roll with what I've got – and this mind of mine has concluded that some things just don't come down to how you see it. Similarly, I'm philosophically permitting other people to decide based on some consistent set of criteria what is Right and Wrong, at the very least to the extent of determining, “I don't like what those people do, even if it's part of a shared identity for lots of them. I'm staying the f@#^ away from them.”

        In any case, you're dooming yourself to reading a whole bunch of Nietzsche real soon. Hope you've got some time to kill, brain power to spare, and the mental fortitude to stare into the abyss and make something useful out of it.

        P.S. OMG ASHLEY KILLS BABBY!!!!111

        • TMFproject

          Haha, oh no – did I just start an unintentional campaign against morality of my own? Nietzsche & I would likely be good friends – I've been intending to read his argument against the morality of Christianity. Perhaps now would be an appropriate time, while I'm on my philosophical streak. :p Thanks so much for contributing to the convo – some good food for thought here!

  • shawnacevraini

    Great post Ashley! What is truth? Society sure wants us to follow along. I love that you remind us to think for ourselves and find our own truths. Awesome writing too, very visual! I could imagine being there in that yard with you!

    • TMFproject

      You know, it raises the question as to whether or not we are even *able* to truly think for ourselves, or if our thoughts are so intertwined with our cultural group thought, that they will always still be reflective of that to some degree. Thoughts?

      • shawnacevraini

        I think they will always be intertwined a little. However, for example, my parents did raise me to be a “certain way” but at the same time, they were successful in raising me to think for myself. They may not always agree with what I say/do, but in the end, they support me. That has always given me the freedom (i.e. I am not afraid) to think for myself. They have taught me to be open to other ideas/beliefs even though some of my “new” beliefs, they disagree with or even think “that isn't right” – which my mom doesn't hesitate to tell me! ;)

        I guess it depends on how constraining the society is. Some are more rigid than others. But, more and more, we are becoming more tolerant, more open, more accepting. That is what we can strive for in teaching our children and sharing with others in our lives. That is my hope, anyway!

        • TMFproject

          Cheers to that! You point to a heavy influence on one's thought patterns that I wasn't even considering–parents. In contemplating that, it's almost scary to realize the control that's afforded to some parents, because not everyone would be open-minded enough to encourage their children to think critically, as your parents have done for you. Imagine. This must be where serial killers come from. :p

  • http://www.thewaythatyouwander.com/ Nate

    Eye opening experiences like that are just awesome. Thanks for sharing this! The bottom line is that nobody has the right to judge anyone else, as weird as it may seem sometimes. A few months back I made a personal challenge for myself: to not judge others in a negative way for 30 days. It was rough to say the least, but it was absolutely wonderful at the same time. Everyone wants to be happy, and they have every right to do what makes them that way. Really good stuff!

    • TMFproject

      I suppose that anytime your thought process conflicts with that of another, you're automatically judging them in some shape, way or form. I imagine we'd have to be unconscious NOT to judge . . . but that still doesn't make it cool, if we're using those judgments to the detriment of others. That said, perhaps forming them is just a byproduct of thinking?

  • http://www.tumblemoose.com/ George Angus

    Ash,

    I'm not so sure you were judging as much as you were reeling from culture shock. No culture is better than any other, they are just different. It's ok for you to be repulsed by what you saw, those feelings are based on your culture. I live in Alaska, which is chock full of weekend warriors driving around in impossibly huge monster pickups decorated with camo stripes. These hunters go out and shoot game to have a trophy. I can't stand it and I cannot abide. But I don't stand on a street corner hurling insults at the bastards either. I try and accept them as part of the f'd up Alaska culture and let them go their merry way.

    George

    • TMFproject

      Wow – now that's interesting. I'm imagining a team of rednecks with big, furry coats. Ha.

      You know what I am in shock about, George? The fact that you live in Alaska! This is so not good, considering that I sent your postcard from Costa Rica to ARKANSAS–I used the address listed on your website. Told you I'd send you one. Hope you get it eventually!

      • http://www.tumblemoose.com/ George Angus

        Ash, I would travel all the way to Arkansas just to get a sniff of a postcard that you held in your lovely hands. Hehe.

        When Clinton was prez, the little town of Hope, AK kept getting mail directed to the Clinton's home town of Hope, AR. Too funny!

        Cheers, world traveler!

        George

  • http://homsic4ph.wordpress.com/ Randall

    I agree with the perspective gut check. We always want everything pre-packaged, sterilized, homogenized and spoon fed to us. If you grew up in the Philippines, hey, you eat some fish eys with your fish! No they don't care if it is staring back at you. It's what you get used to. The head of the fish is actually quite tasty. There are places in this world that I may not agree with some cultural practices such as the treatment of women, but we need to get the American chip off our shoulder and realize that there are indeed other people occupying this planet.

    • TMFproject

      I'm enamored with the way that you've worded your last statement, and think it deserves additional attention:

      “We need to get the American chip off our shoulder and realize that there are indeed other people occupying this planet.”

      What a terrific way to sum up my thoughts, and make a case for awareness. Awareness of the world that surrounds us, awareness of the people that live in it, and awareness of the idea that, as much as we don't like to think so, are only a percentage of the total population. We aren't the world; we're just one small part of it. Thank you for this!

  • http://nifermusings.blogspot.com/ Jen

    I'm so glad you shared this experience! It's so true. We think we have a firm grasp on morality, and then we visit another culture where our morals are thrown in our face. What do we do? It's worth a though.

    • TMFproject

      I think that's exactly the point – what do you do? Is a moral a moral because it's actually right, or is a moral a moral because your collective society has deemed it as such? And if the answer is the latter, then what makes one society better able to determine what's right over another? I think we know intuitively that one society isn't better able to make that call..even if we think we are. But we like to have some sense of what is right and what is wrong so we don't feel at odds with the universe…but our need for comfort shouldn't blind us, either, because then, even if we don't *feel* at odds with the universe, we actually *are.* And which is worse?

  • Abdullah

    Isn't this weird! we really don't like to go through the process as much as we like to see it on our plates. There is nothing wrong or right here it's just different!

    • TMFproject

      Agreed – I often think that since I've never had to actually witness what really has to happen in order for the meat to get on my plate, I just sort of see it as a manufactured product that you take for granted. Like eggs. Until you stop to consider what they really are, it's just something you accept as being in existence–sunny side up, scrambled poached…whatever your pleasure.

  • http://twitter.com/erica_swanson Erica

    Now if only everyone else were nearly half as eager to rethink their cultural perceptions and preconceived flights of fancy around what constitutes “normal”, in whatever context that may be, we might have cause for a global revolution.

    Scary thought, actually.

  • http://twitter.com/erica_swanson Erica

    Now if only everyone else were nearly half as eager to rethink their cultural perceptions and preconceived flights of fancy around what constitutes “normal”, in whatever context that may be, we might have cause for a global revolution.

    Scary thought, actually.

Categories

  • How to Get More Clients + Rock Your Small Biz
  • Lessons + Stories from the Road
  • Must Reads (The Vodka Soaked Variety)
  • Shit That Matters
  • Slap Across The Face
  • Testimonials
  • Why Entrepreneurs Do It Better

Gossip About Us

  • Follow Me | View All

Subscribe

It's free. Unlike the wine you drank last night.

© Copyright TMF Project | Site by Marta SpendowskaPolishLab

HOME | ABOUT | ONLINE CLASSES | POLICY

TMF Project_twitter TMF Project_facebookTMF Project_RSS TMF Project_RSS